SITTIG LAW

+49 40 808 125 550
SITTIG LAW Law Firm Blog

Remand after appeal: What happens after a successful appeal process?

Following a successful appeal, the appellate court usually remands the case for retrial. The new trial court—the so-called second first instance—decides independently where findings have been overturned. Whether acquittal or a new sentence is possible depends on the scope of the appeal.
Read more
Read more
Contact us now
Table of Contents

The most important points in brief

  • Following a successful appeal, the judgment is generally not rendered by the appellate court itself, but rather the case is remanded to another chamber for a new trial (§ 354 StPO).
  • The new trial court is considered a so-called "second first instance": it conducts a completely new trial, but may be bound by existing findings that were not challenged in the appeal.
  • Whether the conviction, sentence, or both are retried depends on the extent to which the appeal was successful.

What does referral back after revision mean?

A successful appeal does not automatically mean acquittal. In only a few cases does the appellate court overturn the verdict and remand the case for a new trial to the lower court. What this specifically means for defendants, how the proceedings in the so-called second first instance work, and what opportunities arise from it, we explain below.

When you are planning an audit or are in an ongoing audit process, I can help you as Experienced audit attorney in the process of developing the best possible strategy.

If the appellate court overturns a judgment, it has two fundamental options: it can decide the case on its merits or remand the case to the lower court. Remand is the standard procedure. It is regulated in § 354 StPO and means that the overturned judgment must be re-decided to the extent it was overturned, and the proceedings are to be retried before a different chamber or division of the lower court—or, exceptionally, before another court of the same level. The appellate court does not make its own decision on guilt or punishment but returns the case to the trial court. In some cases, there are also indications as to how to proceed with the case material in the new trial. The new trial court is then responsible for re-establishing the facts, if necessary, re-evaluating them, and issuing a new judgment.

When does the appellate court decide exceptionally on its own?

The appellate court exceptionally decides itself if this is possible without further factual deliberations. This is the case if an acquittal or dismissal is to be recognized, or if only an absolutely certain sentence is to be considered. Furthermore, the appellate court can refrain from overturning a judgment if only the pronouncement of legal consequences was flawed, but the imposed legal consequence is nevertheless appropriate – or if it reduces the legal consequences itself at the request of the public prosecutor's office. However, this self-decision is strictly limited. It presupposes that no new factual findings are required. As soon as the case requires new evidence collection or a renewed assessment of facts, remanding the case to the trial court is the only permissible route. In practice, self-decision is the exception – remanding the case is the rule.

What is the second first instance?

In practice, the court to which the case is remanded is referred to as the „second first instance.“ The term is not legally binding but fitting: the new trial court generally handles the case like a court of first instance—however, it is not always limited to a mere review. It can gather its own evidence, summon and question witnesses, and arrive at entirely different findings than the original court. It is not bound by the assessment of evidence in the annulled judgment to the extent that the appellate court has annulled the findings of the original judgment. The new trial court may and must decide independently, insofar as the appellate court has placed this within its discretion. This is a significant difference from the appeal itself, which generally does not make findings of fact but only reviews legal errors. Thus, the second first instance can be a genuine new opportunity—with all the possibilities of a full main hearing.

What remains after remand - the binding effect in detail

Not everything is overturned by a successful appeal. According to § 353 StPO, only the findings that are affected by the alleged violation of law are overturned. Findings that were not covered by the appeal remain legally binding. If, for example, the appeal successfully challenged only the sentencing, the conviction remains in place and binds the new trial court. This means: the new court does not have to find the defendant guilty again—this part is already legally established. However, in the context of the new sentencing, it must make its own findings, particularly regarding personal circumstances.

Substantive appeal or procedural appeal: Which appeal decides the scope of the remand?

The type of appeal on which the revision was successful largely determines what will be re-examined after the case is remanded. In the case of a purely substantive appeal—that is, the accusation that substantive law was incorrectly applied to the established facts—the factual findings of the overturned judgment generally remain valid. The new trial court is bound by these findings and can only re-examine the legal questions on this basis. The situation is different with a procedural appeal, which targets procedural errors affecting the factual findings themselves. If the findings are overturned, the new trial court must completely re-investigate the facts to the extent that they have been established. This opens up scope for maneuver but also requires a complete new taking of evidence. Therefore, the choice of appeal type is of considerable strategic importance. To the extent that factual findings are also to be overturned, this must be explicitly considered in the relevant appeal.

What happens to the sentence and the conviction after remand?

After a remand, it depends on which parts of the judgment the appellate court has overturned. If the appeal was successful only in challenging the sentencing, the conviction remains legally binding. The new trial court will then deal exclusively with the legal consequences — in particular, sentencing, measures of rehabilitation and prevention, or other criminal consequences. If, on the other hand, the appeal also encompassed the conviction — for example, because the findings on which it is based were overturned — the new court must also re-decide the question of guilt, i.e., how the defendant committed the offense.

What strategic opportunities does the new procedure offer after remand?

The new proceeding after remand is not merely a repetition. It offers real opportunities that may not have been utilized in the original proceeding. New evidence can be introduced to the extent that the findings have been overturned. Witnesses who gave unproductive or incriminating testimony in the initial proceeding can be heard again – with altered memories or a changed willingness to testify. Expert witnesses can be newly appointed and questioned. Tactically, new possibilities also arise: the strengths and weaknesses of the initial proceeding are known. Experienced criminal defense can specifically prepare the new proceeding, formulate motions for evidence more precisely, and sharpen the defense strategy. Early, structured preparation for the new main hearing is crucial.

Frequently asked questions
The appellate court (partially) overturns the judgment and remands the case for retrial to a different chamber of the court of first instance. The new court retries the case, either fully or partially, depending on the scope of the overturn. A new judgment replaces the overturned one.
Generally, yes. The new trial court conducts its own main hearing. Unless, as an exception, only legal questions are to be decided, a complete new hearing with the taking of evidence will take place. Your defense attorney will prepare you for this date.
Yes — if the findings on conviction have been overturned and the new trial court — potentially based on a new evidence-taking — comes to the conclusion that you cannot be proven to have committed the offense. This depends on the scope of the overturning and the evidence available in the new proceedings.
The substantive objection claims that the substantive law was incorrectly applied to the established facts—the findings themselves remain. The procedural objection attacks the rendering of the judgment and thus usually the factual findings themselves. If successful, these are annulled, and the new court must fully re-examine the facts.
To the findings that were not affected by the appeal and therefore became legally binding in part. If the appeal only successfully challenged the sentencing, the findings regarding guilt are binding. If it also affected findings related to guilt, the new court is completely free.
This depends on the scope of the annulment, the complexity of the case, and the court's caseload. Simpler proceedings can sometimes be completed within a few months, while complex economic criminal or capital cases can take significantly longer.
The pronouncement of legal consequences encompasses all consequences that the court attaches to the finding of guilt: in particular, the penalty, but also measures of amendment and security (e.g., revocation of driver's license, confinement), confiscation, or the conditional suspension of the sentence. All of this can be the subject of the new proceedings if the pronouncement of legal consequences has been overturned.
Absolutely. The new procedure, despite being termed a "second first instance," is not a routine proceeding. The binding effect of existing findings, the risk of harsher sentencing, and the possibility of new evidence motions require careful strategic preparation. A criminal defense focused on appellate proceedings is aware of the weaknesses in the initial proceeding and can utilize the new procedure effectively.

Further contributions

SITTIG LAW
Hamburg location
Head office
Martinistrasse 11
20251 Hamburg
Phone: +49 (0) 40 808 125 550
Fax: +49 (0) 40 808 125 559
Kassel location
Branch office
Motzstrasse 1
34117 Kassel
Phone: +49 (0) 561 510 053 80
Fax: +49 (0) 561 510 053 99
Frankfurt location
Branch office
Oeder Weg 11
60318 Frankfurt am Main
Phone: +49 (0) 69 710 471 070
Fax: +49 (0) 69 710 471 079
Law firm
Criminal defense
Further skills
SITTIG LAW
Lawyer.
Specialist lawyer for criminal law.
Specialist lawyer for IT law.

[email protected]​
Hamburg location
Head office
Martinistr. 11
20251 Hamburg
Tel: +49 (0) 40 808 125 550
Fax: +49 (0) 40 808 125 559

Contact form